Ruxley Crescent

From Claygate
Revision as of 14:01, 23 May 2024 by Gjw5er (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{CPC-key}} __NOTOC__ {{CPC-bar}} {{Places-bar-R}} File:Ruxley cr.jpg === Nyumbani === *{{cpc-value| <!-- property --> Nyumbani, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TZ| <!-- date data retrieved --> 9-MAR-21| <!-- Zoopla estimate --> £1,291,000| <!-- Most recent selling price --> £725,000| <!-- Most recently sold in --> SEP-18}} *{{CPC-planning|2020/3575|Nyumbani, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TZ|Variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2019/1258 (two detached h...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Glossary
AGAR Annual Governance and Accountability Return
CiB Claygate in Bloom
CIL Community Infrastructure Levy
Cllr Councillor
CPC Claygate Parish Council
CPS Claygate Primary School
CRGT Claygate Recreation Ground Trust
CVA Claygate Village Association
CVHA Claygate Village Hall Association
EA Environment Agency
EBC Elmbridge Borough Council
EEFB East Elmbridge Food Bank
EMR Ear Marked Reserves
EYFS Early Years Foundation Stage
FOI Freedom of Information
GDPR General Data Protection Regulation
GH Cllr Geoff Herbert
HGS Highway Garden Sites
H&S Health and Safety
HTC Holy Trinity Claygate
HT&E Highways, Transportation & Environment committee
JB John Bamford
KBC Kingston Borough Council
LDC Lawful Development Certificate
LDS Local Development Scheme
MS Cllr Mark Sugden
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
MT Mark Tymieniecki
NALC National Association of Local Councils
NPPF National Planning Policy Framework
Ofsted Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills
PDF Portable Document Format
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
RBK Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames
RBL Royal British Legion
RFO Responsible Financial Officer
ROSPA Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents
RPI Retail Prices Index
SALC Surrey Association of Local Councils
SCC Surrey County Council
SPD Supplementary Planning Documents
SSALC Surrey and Sussex Associations of Local Councils
SuDs Sustainable Drainage Systems
SWP Staff Working Party
TS Tom Swift
VAT Value Added Tax
VR Vanessa Relleen
YoY Year-on-Year
Choose from the Menu Bar ▼
Future Events
CPC meetings
Policies
Topics
Places

⓪-⑨

Raleigh Drive Raymond Way Claygate Recreation Ground Red Lane Redruth Gardens Rose Cottages Rosehill The Roundway Ruxley Crescent Ruxley Heights Ruxley Ridge Ruxley Towers Rythe Close Rythe (river) Rythe Road

Nyumbani

  • Nyumbani, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TZ: ZOOPLA ESTIMATE £1,291,000 AS AT 9-MAR-21LAST SOLD: SEP-18 FOR £725,000
  • Nyumbani, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TZ2020/3575PROPOSAL: Variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2019/1258 (two detached houses) for the addition of side and rear dormer windows, side roof lights and alterations to fenestration and finish.COUNCIL RESPONSE: No objection, no comment (PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING 25-FEB-21)

Westmoreland

File:Westmore.png
  • Westmoreland, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TX: ZOOPLA ESTIMATE £1,820,000 AS AT 9-FEB-21LAST SOLD: NOV-05 FOR £870,000
  • Westmoreland, Ruxley Crescent, KT10 0TX2020/3509PROPOSAL: First-floor side extension.COUNCIL RESPONSE: No objection, no comment (PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING 28-JAN-21)

White Ridge

  • White Ridge, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TX: ZOOPLA ESTIMATE £1,647,000 AS AT 7-MAR-21LAST SOLD: JUN-11 FOR £985,000
  • White Ridge, Ruxley Crescent KT10 0TX2020/1563PROPOSAL: Front and rear dormer windows and side roof light.COUNCIL RESPONSE: No Comment

Ying Garden Ruxley Garden

File:Ying.png
  • Ying Garden Ruxley Garden, Ruxley Crescent, KT10 0TZ: ZOOPLA ESTIMATE £1,753,000 AS AT 9-FEB-21LAST SOLD: not known FOR listed for £1,695,000 in JUL-19
  • Ying Garden Ruxley Garden, Ruxley Crescent, KT10 0TZ2020/0958PROPOSAL: Boundary treatment comprising of walls, entrance gates and piers to a maximum height of 2.3m following demolition of the existing boundary wall.COUNCIL RESPONSE: Conditions imposed
CPC noted discrepancies in submitted plans and requested for drop kerb access to be considered to maintain pavement condition. Subsequent to CPC’s submission amended plans were submitted to more accurately reflect boundaries and a new entrance plan. Also, additional supporting documents were supplied relating to the arboricultural impact on a nearby tree.
EBC stated:
  • “The proposed works to the wall would reduce the visibility when exiting the adjacent access road, however the wall remains set back from the road by approximately 2.5m Page 4 of 5 and this is considered to provide sufficient visibility for drivers and pedestrians”
  • “A correct ownership certificate is a mandatory requirement of a planning application. The Applicant has signed Certificate A of application form. The planning authority is not an investigator of title and an incorrect ownership certificate is not considered to invalidate an application or its decision given that RHRA have been informed of the application and have been invited to make representations and are not prejudiced by this.”
  • Conditions are imposed regarding “Tree Protection Measures”, “Tree Retention” and a “Landscaping”
  • “In regards to services and utilities, this is not a material planning consideration and is a matter for the applicant and developer to comply with Health and Safety Executive requirements and to address these matters with the relevant utility companies outside of the planning regime” (PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING 5-JAN-21)