Template:Nietzsche zwei: Difference between revisions

From Claygate
Created page with "__NOTOC__ {| cellpadding="6" style="border-left:solid 10px #0000ff;border-right:solid 10px #0000ff;border-top:solid 10px #0000ff;border-bottom:solid 10px #0000ff;" align="center" |- | {{philosophy-bar}} <big><big><big>{{center|The Wells School of Philosophy}}</big></big></big> === Roll Call === right 23rd January 2024, Hare Lane, 1000-1130 hrs: '''Tutors: Linda {{sc|(L)}}, Steve {{sc|(S)}} '''Pupils:''' John {{sc|(J)}}, Patricia {{sc|(P)}},..."
 
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
<big><big><big>{{center|The Wells School of Philosophy}}</big></big></big>
<big><big><big>{{center|The Wells School of Philosophy}}</big></big></big>
=== Roll Call ===
=== Roll Call ===
[[File:Phil16.jpg|right]]
11th March 2024, Hare Lane, 1000-1200 hrs:
23rd January 2024, Hare Lane, 1000-1130 hrs:


'''Tutors:
'''Tutors:
Line 16: Line 15:


'''Pupils:'''
'''Pupils:'''
 
Alexis {{sc|(A)}},
John {{sc|(J)}},  
Howard {{sc|(H)}},
Patricia {{sc|(P)}},
Patricia {{sc|(P)}},
Alexis {{sc|(A)}},  
Ray {{sc|(R)}},
Viki {{sc|(V)}},
Viki {{sc|(V)}},
Colin {{sc|(C)}}


'''Scribe:'''
'''Scribe:'''
Line 27: Line 25:


'''Apologies:'''
'''Apologies:'''
Frank {{sc|(FB)}},
Colin {{sc|(C)}},
David {{sc|(D)}},
David {{sc|(D)}},
John {{sc|(J)}},
Margie {{sc|(M)}},
Margie {{sc|(M)}},
Howard {{sc|(H)}},


----
----


=== The homework set ===
=== The homework set ===
[[File:Leviathan.jpg|right|300px]]


Following on from the Reith lectures, we will be looking at security and liberty, the tension between these in society, and the resultant political stances, decisions and divisions.
As preparation for next Tuesday we would ask everyone to address, say, three of the questions raised in our first discussion which particularly interest you, to do some digging, and come ready to prompt more debate. They were:
# Is it evil if you steal a bun because you are hungry?
# The Southport killings: an act of evil?
# Can evil actions only be described thus when their perpetrator is evil?
# How should we view the Holocaust? Evil conducted by evil people.
# Does society determine what is good and evil?
# Is there such a thing as good per se? Or evil per se?
# Can evil only exist between humans?
# Does the thought of the slate being wiped clean help the perpetrator?


Until now we have not explored Hobbes, whose political philosophy is pertinent to this topic, so I have looked through some links. The ''In Our Time'' episode on Hobbes{{su|[1]}} is a good starting point. The Wikipedia entry{{su|[3]}} on Hobbes is not well-written; it is better to look at the Internet Encyclopaedia{{su|[2]}}. And the recent article by {{sc|LSE}} law lecturer Gearty{{su|[4]}} is interesting.
One particularly fertile area could be the way Nietzsche conflates philosophy and psychology; is this helpful?
* To what extent do we need to dig into psychology to understand the nature of the human condition and what makes humans different from other animal species. (This is related to our discussion of the nature of evil, and the role of forgiveness in human relationships.)
We could endeavour to wrap up our discussion by comparing the relevance of insights generated by Nietzsche with the overall philosophies of say Kant, Rousseau, Marx and Hume.


The listening and reading set by Linda are both fascinating and somewhat challenging. Certainly thought-provoking, with lots of philosophical issues to get your teeth into. We're very much looking forward to hearing what you made of it, in particular about the way freedom and security interact in today's fragmented and dangerous world.
=== Introduction{{su|(S)}} ===
* Nietzsche's ideas can be hard to grasp. He had insights into the human condition.  
* If Hobbes were around now and could reflect on the evolution of democracy over the last 200 years, and the rise of technology and mass communications, would he come to the same conclusions about the need for an omnipotent sovereign to maintain peace amongst a selfish, individualistic citizenry? With whom or what does the security buck stop?
* Was he a nihilist? A pessimist?  
* Does altruism have any role in Hobbes's philosophy? And relatedly, can egoists have genuine friendships?
* How did he consider evil? Could only humans perpetrate evil?  
* If  Hobbes's ''mechanical bodies'' are programmed to pursue self-interest, is there any scope for what could be called morals?
* What was his moral framework? How did he view suffering?  
* Is Hobbes a Platonist? … mirroring Plato's knowledge vs. belief, with science vs. opinion?
* Was he reckless?  
* Is Hobbes desirably hard-headed, realistic, in his judgement of how political issues can be resolved, based on the realities of human conduct &mdash; self-interest being the prime motivator of behaviour.
* Why did he support the peasantry? Why did he not like capitalists? What would he think of Trump?
* But … is there another dimension to his view of self-interest... an enlightened self-interest, the notion that what's good for society will probably be good for me as well, rather than "We want all we can get" and to avoid death? Can we really know for sure what and where our ultimate interests lie?  
* He sought truth through art and science. He thought language was not up to the job.
*What might Hobbes think about the notion of trust? What role does it, can it, have? For example in the contracts that we inevitably enter into …
* In a post-Christian era, did he have anything to fill the vacuum? *
* Hobbes suggests that we have a right to self-preservation, and to how to ensure this? Is he right?
* He could be very spirited.
* He was anti-meek.


=== Introduction{{su|(S)}}   ===
=== Addendum{{su|(L)}} ===
* Hobbes was a materialist, impatient of those who over-theorised, and wary of orators.
* Nietzsche set out to be a disruptor, to enable the creation of new values. Christianity’s focus on an afterlife was bad for mankind, he believed.
* He was both pro-monarchy and pro-Cromwell in his stance against some forms of religion.
* In order to overcome existing values, he believed you had to step back and ask how have you got these values? He doubted the  universal validity of everything.  
* He pre-dated both Locke and Hume.
* Nietzsche's influence on the "hermeneutics of suspicion," a term coined by Paul Ricoeur, lies in his critique of traditional knowledge and morality, arguing for a persistent questioning of underlying motivations and interpretations, exposing hidden interests and "illusory truths".  
* You must still have chaos in yourself, he thought. We should not accept situation we find  ourselves in.
* The ''Übermensch'' is a philosophical concept by Friedrich Nietzsche that translates to "superman" or "overman". Nietzsche believed that the ''Übermensch'' was a goal for humanity to strive towards.
* Marx's dialectic was the class struggle.
* Psychoanalysis considers everything except the will to find meaning to one's life.


=== Discussion ===
=== Discussion ===
* He provided an important step in the evolution of modern philosophy.{{su|(C)}}
* Bentham: the idea of the rights of Man is 'nonsense on stilts'.{{su|(S)}}
* Hobbes seemed not to rely on other people.{{su|(V)}}
* Hobbes didn't address the underlying problems behind the English Civil war.{{su|(V)}}
* Hobbes sidelined rationality; he believed we are driven by appetites rather than the will.{{su|(L)}}
* Hobbes seemed to reduce people to machines. He was dismissive of many of our emotions.{{su|(V)}}
* We need to check our understanding of the definitions of '''liberty''' and '''security'''.{{su|(L)}}
* The dictatorships of China and Russia seem Hobbesian, frightening their people into submission.{{su|(A)}}
* Hobbes was an early empiricist, who believed in the iron fist of the law to ensure our security. Did this actually confer greater freedom upon us?{{su|(S)}}
* If our contract is with the current sovereign, what happens when he or she dies? And do my children automatically inherit that contract with the sovereign?{{su|(J)}}


==== Planning ====
==== Nietzsche's Other-worldliness ====
* Some people seem determined not to change their minds, no matter what arises.{{su|(V)}}
* 🄽's focus seemed to be on the individual, but what about the effect of his remedies on society?{{su|(V)}}
* But the future is always trumpet-shaped.{{su|(C)}}
* High achievers often neglect their families.{{su|(V)}}
* Bayes' Theorem provides the justification for changing one's mind in the light of subsequent events.{{su|(S)}}
* In 🄽’s day, expectations often constrained your career. We are much freer today. But to some extent, society may have suffered.{{su|(V)}}
* Many organisations use scenario planning to examine possible futures and identify common occurrences across those scenarios.{{su|(J)}}
* 🄽 was incredibly bright, and perhaps unable to appreciate the lack of understanding of others.{{su|(V)}}
* Brainstorming seems a less common technique today; perhaps because totalitarian regimes don't like creativity.{{su|(L)}}
* His admiration was for people who have run roughshod over others.{{su|(A)}}
* The basic four questions recommended to analyse any situation in ''Getting to Yes''{{su|[6]}} are:
* Was he an architect or an engineer?{{su|(V)}}
*# What happened?
* Wittgenstein was very scornful of others who didn’t understand his ideas.{{su|(L)}}
*# How do we feel about it?
* He had an unworldly view of people. Perhaps he was detached from reality.{{su|(R)}}  
*# What are the things we could do?
* 🄽 lacked deep knowledge of social structures.{{su|(V)}}
*# What should we do?{{su|(S)}}
* ''Start the Week'' yesterday examined why people stick to their ideas despite the contradicting evidence. But it missed 🄽’s idea of the will.{{su|(S)}}
* It's quite a struggle to change your mind.{{su|(V)}}
* Grandchildren can change your viewpoint. The fact that you know their parents is a source of power.{{su|(P)}}


==== Lack of Progress Today ====
==== Religion ====
* Do we need a shared enemy to bring us together?{{su|(V)}}
* Zoroastrianism gives us good and evil and therefore the free will to make a choice. If you get get 'Beyond Good and Evil', you’re left with free will.{{su|(A)}}
* Today the driving force seems to be whom you're hating, not whom you're loving.{{su|(S)}}
* 🄽 saw Christianity as a terrible affliction.{{su|(L)}}
** This attitude seems to have spread from Parliament.{{su|(V)}}
* 🄽 was critical of Paul as perverting the message of Jesus.{{su|(L)}}
** Too many of our systems are adversarial.
* Jesus was more like Che Guevara.{{su|(S)}}  
** Very few people are aware of what goes on in Parliament. The big driver of hatred is anonymity on the Internet.{{su|(G)}}
* Why did ''Parsifal'' split Wagner and 🄽? The search for the Holy Grail.{{su|(P)}}
** There should be much more emphasis on face-to-face communications.{{su|(L)}}
** Times are different today. So often both parents are working full-time: no wonder there has been a shift to social media.
* The right solutions to many problems seem obvious today. So why aren't they being implemented?{{su|(L)}}
* The Southern US states seem determinedly anti-intellectual.{{su|(C)}}
** This attitude can be found everywhere&mdash;e.g. in anti-vax thinking.{{su|(L)}}


=== Other topics touched on ===
==== Nietzsche's Era ====
*Alcoholic parents as a driver of ambition.{{su|(L)}}
* Was he influenced by Darwin?{{su|(R)}}
* The working day in Norway.{{su|(S)}}
* 🄽 saw a more encompassing type of evolution.{{su|(L)}}
* 🄽 thought science was life-denying.{{su|(V)}}
* In his era, a lot of theories were developing in the field of psychology.{{su|(R)}}
* Did 🄽 have a strong view of free will? Do we control our instincts?{{su|(S)}}
* 🄽 was not the first to think about self-improvement: for example, working men’s colleges.{{su|(V)}}
* Plato believed in the pursuit of excellence.{{su|(S)}}
* 🄽 believed in hierarchies. But fought against Marx.{{su|(S)}}
* Wagner and 🄽 had been revolutionaries together.{{su|(L)}}
* Wagner had to go cap-in-hand to capitalists to finance Bayreuth, a decision which 🄽 hated.{{su|(L)}}
 
==== Nietzsche today ====
* Is man realistic in the way he lives his life?{{su|(R)}}
* Does the man in street think about climate change?{{su|(H)}}
** He wonders what difference he can make when the government is planning a third runway.{{su|(V)}}
* What would 🄽 say now about morality?{{su|(S)}}
* He would question anything that is taught.{{su|(V)}}
* One of the features of modern education in England is to give children the tool of critical thinking, rather than learning by rote.{{su|(L)}}
* Trump is the great disruptor.{{su|(S)}}


----
----
==== References ====
==== Programmes referenced ====
* [1] ''In Our Time:'' '''Hobbes.''' https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p003k9l1
* [1] The "Remember Preston?" ad starts at 2 mins 53 secs in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQtxKRAJz00
* [2] ''Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:'' '''Thomas Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy''' https://iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/#:~:text=His
* [2] Channel Four's ''Brian and Maggie'' is at https://www.channel4.com/programmes/brian-and-maggie
* [3]: ''Wikipedia'': '''Thomas Hobbes''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes
* [3] Radio Four's ''Start the Week'' yesterday was on how political ideology affects the brain. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0028stg
* [4]: ''Gearty, Conor.'' '''Escaping Hobbes: Liberty and Security for Our Democratic (Not Anti-Terrorist) Age''' https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32906/1/WPS2010-03_Gearty.pdf
* [4] ''Michael Sheen's Secret Million Pound Giveaway'' on Channel 4: https://www.channel4.com/programmes/michael-sheens-secret-million-pound-giveaway
* [5]: Rachel Cooke (7th January 2024). '''Liam Byrne: ‘I’d say about a quarter to a third of MPs are the children of alcoholics’''' https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/jan/07/liam-byrne-inequality-wealth-interview-labour-note-no-money-treasury
 
==== Books Suggested: ====
*[6]: {{bookref|<!-- Author --> Roger Fisher and William Ury|<!-- Title --> Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In|<!-- Publisher --> Houghton Mifflin|1981<!-- Year of Publication -->|<!-- City of Publication -->}}
*[7]: {{bookref|<!-- Author --> Richard Dawkins|<!-- Title --> The Selfish Gene|<!-- Publisher --> Oxford University Press|1976<!-- Year of Publication -->|<!-- City of Publication -->}}


|-
|-
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 10:25, 7 June 2025

Choose from the Philosophy Menu Bar ▼
HOME
INDEX
Justice
6.v.25
The Good Life
20.v.25
Hume & Testimony
3.vi.25
1H25 Reflections
17.vi.25
Nietzsche 1
24.ii.25
Nietzsche 2
11.iii.25
Universal Basic Income
25.iii.25
Hegel
22.iv.25
2024 Wrap-Up
10.x.24
Democracy
14.i.25
Civilisation?
28.i.25
Compulsory Voting?
11.ii.25
Berlin and Freedom
15.x.24
Nussbaum, Sen and Capability
29.x.24
Slavery Reparations
12.xi.24
Rawls
26.xi.24
Assisted Suicide
11.vi.24
Popper and Evolution
20.viii.24
Popper continued
17.ix.24
Berlin and Romanticism
1.x.24
Marx
19.iii.24
Kant and Knowledge
16.iv.24
Kant and Morality
30.iv.24
Education and Religion
14.v.24
Hobbes & Security
23.i.24
From Locke to Mill
6.ii.24
Rousseau: Social Contract
20.ii.24
Rousseau and Education
5.iii.24
AI and Ethics
31.x.23
Aristotle and AI
14.xi.23
Autumn 2023 Review
28.xi.23
Democracy
9.i.24
Private Education
5.ix.23
The Very Elderly
19.ix.23
Justifiable Law-breaking
3.x.23
Moral Authority
17.x.23
The Wells School of Philosophy

Roll Call

11th March 2024, Hare Lane, 1000-1200 hrs:

Tutors: Linda (L), Steve (S)

Pupils: Alexis (A), Howard (H), Patricia (P), Ray (R), Viki (V),

Scribe: Gavin (G)

Apologies: Colin (C), David (D), John (J), Margie (M),


The homework set

As preparation for next Tuesday we would ask everyone to address, say, three of the questions raised in our first discussion which particularly interest you, to do some digging, and come ready to prompt more debate. They were:

  1. Is it evil if you steal a bun because you are hungry?
  2. The Southport killings: an act of evil?
  3. Can evil actions only be described thus when their perpetrator is evil?
  4. How should we view the Holocaust? Evil conducted by evil people.
  5. Does society determine what is good and evil?
  6. Is there such a thing as good per se? Or evil per se?
  7. Can evil only exist between humans?
  8. Does the thought of the slate being wiped clean help the perpetrator?

One particularly fertile area could be the way Nietzsche conflates philosophy and psychology; is this helpful?

  • To what extent do we need to dig into psychology to understand the nature of the human condition and what makes humans different from other animal species. (This is related to our discussion of the nature of evil, and the role of forgiveness in human relationships.)

We could endeavour to wrap up our discussion by comparing the relevance of insights generated by Nietzsche with the overall philosophies of say Kant, Rousseau, Marx and Hume.

Introduction(S)

  • Nietzsche's ideas can be hard to grasp. He had insights into the human condition.
  • Was he a nihilist? A pessimist?
  • How did he consider evil? Could only humans perpetrate evil?
  • What was his moral framework? How did he view suffering?
  • Was he reckless?
  • Why did he support the peasantry? Why did he not like capitalists? What would he think of Trump?
  • He sought truth through art and science. He thought language was not up to the job.
  • In a post-Christian era, did he have anything to fill the vacuum? *
  • He could be very spirited.
  • He was anti-meek.

Addendum(L)

  • Nietzsche set out to be a disruptor, to enable the creation of new values. Christianity’s focus on an afterlife was bad for mankind, he believed.
  • In order to overcome existing values, he believed you had to step back and ask how have you got these values? He doubted the universal validity of everything.
  • Nietzsche's influence on the "hermeneutics of suspicion," a term coined by Paul Ricoeur, lies in his critique of traditional knowledge and morality, arguing for a persistent questioning of underlying motivations and interpretations, exposing hidden interests and "illusory truths".
  • You must still have chaos in yourself, he thought. We should not accept situation we find ourselves in.
  • The Übermensch is a philosophical concept by Friedrich Nietzsche that translates to "superman" or "overman". Nietzsche believed that the Übermensch was a goal for humanity to strive towards.
  • Marx's dialectic was the class struggle.
  • Psychoanalysis considers everything except the will to find meaning to one's life.

Discussion

Nietzsche's Other-worldliness

  • 🄽's focus seemed to be on the individual, but what about the effect of his remedies on society?(V)
  • High achievers often neglect their families.(V)
  • In 🄽’s day, expectations often constrained your career. We are much freer today. But to some extent, society may have suffered.(V)
  • 🄽 was incredibly bright, and perhaps unable to appreciate the lack of understanding of others.(V)
  • His admiration was for people who have run roughshod over others.(A)
  • Was he an architect or an engineer?(V)
  • Wittgenstein was very scornful of others who didn’t understand his ideas.(L)
  • He had an unworldly view of people. Perhaps he was detached from reality.(R)
  • 🄽 lacked deep knowledge of social structures.(V)
  • Start the Week yesterday examined why people stick to their ideas despite the contradicting evidence. But it missed 🄽’s idea of the will.(S)
  • It's quite a struggle to change your mind.(V)
  • Grandchildren can change your viewpoint. The fact that you know their parents is a source of power.(P)

Religion

  • Zoroastrianism gives us good and evil and therefore the free will to make a choice. If you get get 'Beyond Good and Evil', you’re left with free will.(A)
  • 🄽 saw Christianity as a terrible affliction.(L)
  • 🄽 was critical of Paul as perverting the message of Jesus.(L)
  • Jesus was more like Che Guevara.(S)
  • Why did Parsifal split Wagner and 🄽? The search for the Holy Grail.(P)

Nietzsche's Era

  • Was he influenced by Darwin?(R)
  • 🄽 saw a more encompassing type of evolution.(L)
  • 🄽 thought science was life-denying.(V)
  • In his era, a lot of theories were developing in the field of psychology.(R)
  • Did 🄽 have a strong view of free will? Do we control our instincts?(S)
  • 🄽 was not the first to think about self-improvement: for example, working men’s colleges.(V)
  • Plato believed in the pursuit of excellence.(S)
  • 🄽 believed in hierarchies. But fought against Marx.(S)
  • Wagner and 🄽 had been revolutionaries together.(L)
  • Wagner had to go cap-in-hand to capitalists to finance Bayreuth, a decision which 🄽 hated.(L)

Nietzsche today

  • Is man realistic in the way he lives his life?(R)
  • Does the man in street think about climate change?(H)
    • He wonders what difference he can make when the government is planning a third runway.(V)
  • What would 🄽 say now about morality?(S)
  • He would question anything that is taught.(V)
  • One of the features of modern education in England is to give children the tool of critical thinking, rather than learning by rote.(L)
  • Trump is the great disruptor.(S)

Programmes referenced