Template:Nietzsche zwei: Difference between revisions
From Claygate
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
=== Addendum{{su|(L)}} === | === Addendum{{su|(L)}} === | ||
* Nietzsche set out to be a disruptor, to enable the creation of new values. Christianity’s focus on afterlife was bad for mankind, he believed. | * Nietzsche set out to be a disruptor, to enable the creation of new values. Christianity’s focus on an afterlife was bad for mankind, he believed. | ||
* In order to overcome existing values, he believed you had to step back and | * In order to overcome existing values, he believed you had to step back and ask how have you got these values? He doubted the universal validity of everything. | ||
* Nietzsche's influence on the "hermeneutics of suspicion," a term coined by Paul Ricoeur, lies in his critique of traditional knowledge and morality, arguing for a persistent questioning of underlying motivations and interpretations, exposing hidden interests and "illusory truths". | * Nietzsche's influence on the "hermeneutics of suspicion," a term coined by Paul Ricoeur, lies in his critique of traditional knowledge and morality, arguing for a persistent questioning of underlying motivations and interpretations, exposing hidden interests and "illusory truths". | ||
* You must still have chaos in yourself, he thought. We should not accept situation we find | * You must still have chaos in yourself, he thought. We should not accept situation we find ourselves in. | ||
* The ''Übermensch'' is a philosophical concept by Friedrich Nietzsche that translates to "superman" or "overman". Nietzsche believed that the ''Übermensch'' was a goal for humanity to strive towards. | * The ''Übermensch'' is a philosophical concept by Friedrich Nietzsche that translates to "superman" or "overman". Nietzsche believed that the ''Übermensch'' was a goal for humanity to strive towards. | ||
* Marx's dialectic was the class struggle. | * Marx's dialectic was the class struggle. |
Latest revision as of 10:25, 7 June 2025
The Wells School of Philosophy
Roll Call11th March 2024, Hare Lane, 1000-1200 hrs: Tutors: Linda (L), Steve (S) Pupils: Alexis (A), Howard (H), Patricia (P), Ray (R), Viki (V), Scribe: Gavin (G) Apologies: Colin (C), David (D), John (J), Margie (M), The homework setAs preparation for next Tuesday we would ask everyone to address, say, three of the questions raised in our first discussion which particularly interest you, to do some digging, and come ready to prompt more debate. They were:
One particularly fertile area could be the way Nietzsche conflates philosophy and psychology; is this helpful?
We could endeavour to wrap up our discussion by comparing the relevance of insights generated by Nietzsche with the overall philosophies of say Kant, Rousseau, Marx and Hume. Introduction(S)
Addendum(L)
DiscussionNietzsche's Other-worldliness
Religion
Nietzsche's Era
Nietzsche today
Programmes referenced
|