Template:Conscious: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__NOTOC__ {| cellpadding="6" style="border-left:solid 10px #00aad4;border-right:solid 10px #00aad4;border-top:solid 10px #00aad4;border-bottom:solid 10px #00aad4;" align="center" |- | <big><big><big>{{center|The Wells School of Philosophy}}</big></big></big> === Roll Call === 21st October 2025, Hare Lane, 1030-1230 hrs: '''Tutors: Linda {{sc|(L)}}, Steve {{sc|(S)}} '''Present:''' Alexis {{sc|(A)}}, Margie {{sc|(M)}}, Patricia {{sc|(P)}}, Ray {{sc|(R)}}, Robin {{sc..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
*3. If you try to break down consciousness into its component elements, and how these interact, and by implication, its causes, is there something necessarily left out/over? | *3. If you try to break down consciousness into its component elements, and how these interact, and by implication, its causes, is there something necessarily left out/over? | ||
* 3a. If so, what? Is consciousness necessarily more than the sum of its parts? | * 3a. If so, what? Is consciousness necessarily more than the sum of its parts? | ||
*4. Where do moral judgements fit into consciousness, and what it is, uniquely, to be a human being? For example, being instinctively sympathetic to our fellow humans, a la Rousseau, or aggressively individualistic, a la Hobbes (?Trump?) | *4. Where do moral judgements fit into consciousness, and what it is, uniquely, to be a human being? For example, being instinctively sympathetic to our fellow humans, a la Rousseau, or aggressively individualistic, a la Hobbes (?Trump?) | ||
*5. Can we really 'explain' consciousness? Will we ever? Are current views simply barking up the wrong tree, being materially based, when substance/matter could be considered as energy-based? We do talk about 'life forces'… | *5. Can we really 'explain' consciousness? Will we ever? Are current views simply barking up the wrong tree, being materially based, when substance/matter could be considered as energy-based? We do talk about 'life forces'… | ||
*6. What hope for the future might the 'fire together, wire together' concept referred to in the IOT on consciousness and imagination yield?…that it's possible constantly for people to change as a consequence of experiences, and not be locked into our genomes? And relatedly: | *6. What hope for the future might the 'fire together, wire together' concept referred to in the IOT on consciousness and imagination yield?…that it's possible constantly for people to change as a consequence of experiences, and not be locked into our genomes? And relatedly: | ||
Latest revision as of 21:12, 21 October 2025
|
The Wells School of Philosophy
Roll Call21st October 2025, Hare Lane, 1030-1230 hrs: Tutors: Linda (L), Steve (S) Present: Alexis (A), Margie (M), Patricia (P), Ray (R), Robin (ℜ), Viki (V) Scribe: Gavin (G) Apologies: Colin (C), Howard (H), John (J) Valete: David The homework suggested by RayA topic that comes to mind for our future possible deliberations and debate is that which involves the extensive subject of Consciousness. This has taxed those from many areas of interest, not least in areas of science both physical and human. Given the so-called 'hard problem of consciousness' (after the philosopher David Chalmers) makes for a fruitful area for philosophical examination. The 'hard problem' asks why and how physical brain processes give rise to subjective experiences, or qualia — the "what it's like" feeling of experiencing something, such as the colour red or the taste of chocolate. It is essentially distinct from the 'easy problems', which focus on explaining the cognitive and behavioural functions of the brain. The 'hard problem' highlights an explanatory gap between objective and physical states and subjective, phenomenal experiences, as scientific explanations of brain function don't inherently explain the felt nature of consciousness. If this was not enough we might follow on with consideration of the possible impacts of expanding AI developments in this field. Questions set by SteveHere are ten questions we might ponder as preparation, in no particular order:
Discussion
The physicists have their say…
Consciousness and Understandinng
Memory, emotions and therapy
Down the Smartphone rabbit-hole again…
And the USA…
Souls and the Meaning of Life
Poetry mentionedAdlestrop
Books referenced
Consciousness GlossaryCconsciousness Modern neuroscience definition: any kind of subjective experience whatsoever. Hegel's definition: the relation of the "Ego" to an object, which can be either external or internal
Ddualism the belief that consciousness (mind) and physical matter are separate substaces or modes of existence, raising the tricky oroblem of how the two ever interact.
Eepiphenomenalism a philosophical theory stating that mental events are caused by physical brain events, but the mental events themselves have no causal effect on the physical world. Mental states are considered by-products, or "epiphenomena," of physical processes, like steam from a locomotive which has no effect on its work.
Ffunctionalism the idea that consciousness depends, not on what a system is made of, but only on what the system does, on the functions it performs, on how it tranforms inputs into outputs.
Iidealism the idea that consciousness (or mind) is the ultimate source of reality, not phsical stuff or matter.
Llocked-in syndrome a condition where consciousness is fully present despite total paralysis of the body.
Mmaterialism see PHYSICALISM.
mysterianism the idea that there may exist a complete physical explanation of consciousness, but that we humans will never be clever enough to discover this solution.
Nnaive dualism the seductive intuition that conscious expereinces seem non-physical, driving a belief about how things actually are.
Oontology the study of what exists; a set of concepts and categories in a subject area or domain that shows their properties and the relations between them.
Ppanpsychism the idea that consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe, alongside other fundamental properties such as mass/energy and charge; that it is present to some degree everywhere and in everything.
phenomenology the subjective properties of conscious experience.
physicalism the idea that the universe is made of physical stuff, and that conscious states are either identical to, or somehow emerge from, particular arrangements of this physical stuff.
Qqualia the subjective, conscious experiences of an individual, such as the taste of a lemon, the pain of a headache, or the redness of a sunset.
Vvegetative state a catastrophic condition in which a person still cycles through sleep and wakefulness but shows no behavioural signs of conscious awareness.
vitalism the belief that the property of being alive could only be explained by appealing to some special sauce: a spark of life.
|
